Translational Control: Regulation of eIF2

点击下载PDF>>

 

Pathway Description:

The eIF2 initiation complex integrates a diverse array of stress-related signals to regulate both global and specific mRNA translation. Under permissive conditions, eIF2 binds GTP and Met-tRNAi to form the ternary complex (TC), which then associates with the 40S ribosomal subunit, eIF1, eIF1A, eIF5, and eIF3 to form the 43S pre-initiation complex (PIC). The 43S PIC scans the mRNA UTR for an AUG start codon. Upon AUG recognition, eIF2 hydrolyzes GTP to GDP with the help of the GTPase activating protein eIF5 and dissociates from the mRNA, permitting the binding of the 60S ribosomal subunit and elongation of the polypeptide chain. eIF2 remains bound to GDP in the presence of eIF5 acting as a GDI. To permit another round of initiation, eIF2B must act as both a GDI displacement factor (GDF) and a guanine exchange factor (GEF) to allow exchange of GDP for GTP on eIF2. This step is tightly regulated, and phosphorylation of eIF2α by a diverse family of four stress activated kinases—PKR (dsRNA), PERK (ER stress), GCN2 (amino acid starvation), and HRI (heme deficiency)—prevents nucleotide exchange by causing eIF2 to act as a dominant negative complex to sequester eIF2B. The resulting increase in eIF2α-GDP limits the availability of the ternary complex and causes a decrease in global protein synthesis and an enhancement of the translation of specific stressrelated mRNA transcripts, such as the transcription factors ATF-4 and CHOP.

Selected Reviews:

    Hinnebusch AG (2011) Molecular mechanism of scanning and start codon selection in eukaryotes.Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 75(3), 434–67, first page of table of contents.
    Raven JF, Koromilas AE (2008) PERK and PKR: old kinases learn new tricks. Cell Cycle 7(9), 1146–50.
    Schmitt E, Naveau M, Mechulam Y (2010) Eukaryotic and archaeal translation initiation factor 2: a heterotrimeric tRNA carrier. FEBS Lett. 584(2), 405–12.
    Stolboushkina EA, Garber MB (2011) Eukaryotic type translation initiation factor 2: structure-functional aspects. Biochemistry Mosc. 76(3), 283–94.
    Wek RC, Jiang HY, Anthony TG (2006) Coping with stress: eIF2 kinases and translational control.Biochem. Soc. Trans. 34(Pt 1), 7–11.

We would like to thank Rachel Wolfson and Prof. David Sabatini, Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, MIT, Cambridge, MA, for reviewing this diagram.

created January 2002

 

revised June 2014